# QorLogic Meta Ledger

## Chain Status: ACTIVE
## Genesis: 2026-04-28T01:00:52Z

---

### Entry #1: GENESIS

**Timestamp**: 2026-04-28T01:00:52Z
**Phase**: BOOTSTRAP
**Author**: Governor (executed via `/qor-bootstrap`)
**Risk Grade**: L2

**Content Hash**:
SHA256(CONCEPT.md + ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md) = `29dfd085d2993f4a72dc1157d5d0cd33b818bdd3df3de2356c6e62e212457a1d`

**Previous Hash**: GENESIS (no predecessor)

**Decision**: Project DNA initialized. Lifecycle: ALIGN/ENCODE complete.

**Branch deviation note**: Bootstrap was executed inline on the QOR-process
feature branch `claude/codegenome-phase-1-2-qor` (off `upstream/main`)
instead of a dedicated `feat/bicameral-mcp-genesis` branch, by user
direction — these genesis docs are part of the QOR-process artifact for
side-by-side comparison against an ad-hoc reference build on
`claude/elegant-euclid-feeb63`. The genesis hash above remains the
canonical chain anchor regardless of branch.

---

### Entry #2: PLAN

**Timestamp**: 2026-04-28T00:55:00Z (preceded bootstrap chronologically)
**Phase**: PLAN
**Author**: Governor (executed via `/qor-plan`)
**Risk Grade**: L2 (inherited from genesis)

**Artifact**: `plan-codegenome-phase-1-2.md`

**Previous Hash**: `29dfd085...` (genesis)

**Scope**: CodeGenome Phase 1+2 — adapter boundary + bind-time identity
records, against upstream issue #59. Two-phase plan with TDD-ordered
unit + integration tests; locked architecture decisions on module placement
(flat `codegenome/`), composition (handler-orchestrated), factory pattern
(`adapters/codegenome.py`), and hash strategy (sha256 content for ledger
parity, blake2b signature). Three open questions flagged at top.

**Decision**: Plan accepted by user; one `{{verify}}` tag remains on the
`subject_identity.content_hash == code_region.content_hash` exit
criterion for auditor grading.

**Next required action**: `/qor-audit` (mandatory for L2).

---

### Entry #3: GATE TRIBUNAL

**Timestamp**: 2026-04-28T01:06:38Z
**Phase**: GATE
**Author**: Judge (executed via `/qor-audit`)
**Risk Grade**: L2
**Verdict**: VETO
**Mode**: solo (codex-plugin shortfall logged)

**Content Hash**:
SHA256(AUDIT_REPORT.md) = `a404e4bf9d46b0b71e2796b1fd48b46d8036ad2a1bacd2d5b9150fbb5c891a20`

**Previous Hash**: `29dfd085...` (Genesis)

**Chain Hash**:
SHA256(content_hash + previous_hash) = `c31802d7bbf38f70cc466b0990903027dde75b57f0856529df537adef559d8c2`

**Decision**: VETO. Three violations: V1/V2 grounding (residual `{{verify}}`
tags violate qor-plan Step 2b doctrine); V3 orphan/scope-creep
(`SubjectIdentityModel` not issue-mandated, no caller, exceeds anti-goal
Q2=B authorization). Substance of plan is sound on architecture, composition,
dependency direction, test coverage, security, OWASP, and convention
alignment. Remediation is surgical: pin one placeholder, delete two tags,
delete one Pydantic model. Re-audit required before `/qor-implement`.

---

### Entry #4: GATE TRIBUNAL (Re-Audit)

**Timestamp**: 2026-04-28T01:13:24Z
**Phase**: GATE
**Author**: Judge (executed via `/qor-audit`)
**Risk Grade**: L2
**Verdict**: PASS
**Mode**: solo (capability shortfall logged in entry #3, not duplicating)

**Content Hash**:
SHA256(AUDIT_REPORT.md) = `761013d188d90b6d96ba6d8782f93a9b2001c1270e9b0892a53ada85c99213ad`

**Previous Hash**: `c31802d7...` (Entry #3, predecessor VETO)

**Chain Hash**:
SHA256(content_hash + previous_hash) = `0fc97cd3169c75d5c1f95fb537b0aab5660375862ffbd17f13a0baafc5ad160d`

**Decision**: PASS. All three predecessor violations (V1, V2, V3) are
closed by surgical remediations in `plan-codegenome-phase-1-2.md`.
`grep -c "{{verify"` → 0; `grep -n "SubjectIdentityModel"` → no matches.
No new violations introduced. All other audit passes (Security, OWASP,
Ghost UI, Razor, Dependency, Macro Architecture) remain PASS. Section 4
razor footprint *improved* (contracts.py is now smaller). Gate is OPEN
for `/qor-implement`.

---

### Entry #5: IMPLEMENTATION

**Timestamp**: 2026-04-28T01:49:30Z
**Phase**: IMPLEMENT
**Author**: Specialist (executed via `/qor-implement`)
**Risk Grade**: L2
**Mode**: sequential (capability shortfalls for `qor/scripts` runtime + agent-teams logged at prior phases)

**Files created**:
- `codegenome/__init__.py`, `adapter.py`, `contracts.py`, `confidence.py`, `config.py`,
  `deterministic_adapter.py`, `bind_service.py`
- `adapters/codegenome.py`
- `tests/test_codegenome_{adapter,bind_integration,confidence,config}.py`

**Files modified**:
- `ledger/schema.py` (SCHEMA_VERSION 10 → 11; +CodeGenome tables/edges; +`_migrate_v10_to_v11`)
- `ledger/queries.py` (+5 query functions)
- `ledger/adapter.py` (+5 thin wrapper methods + import additions)
- `context.py` (+`codegenome` and `codegenome_config` fields on `BicameralContext`; populated in `from_env()`)
- `handlers/bind.py` (+side-effect identity-write hook, gated by `ctx.codegenome_config.identity_writes_active()`)
- `.gitignore` (+QOR governance directories)

**Content Hash**:
SHA256(impl files concatenated by sorted path) = `e217fb615d821fbb2f89e4a1f800a23d4ebf10f6ac89b55d3362fd95f094fae9`

**Previous Hash**: `0fc97cd3...` (Entry #4, PASS verdict)

**Chain Hash**:
SHA256(content_hash + previous_hash) = `eed1816066b0b65082adf9711dffe1b8a91e6f0b9a5cecf9258ffe3521a0429b`

**Test results**:
- Codegenome unit + integration: 49 passed / 0 failed (this PR)
- Section 4 razor self-check: PASS — all new functions ≤ 40 lines (one mid-implement violation in `bind_service.write_codegenome_identity` was caught and refactored into `_check_hash_parity` + `_persist_subject_and_identity` helpers per Step 9)
- Full suite regression: 254 passed / 81 failed against the implementation; baseline (pristine upstream/main `6bdff24`) was 250 passed / 85 failed → **zero regressions introduced; 4 codegenome integration tests now pass that previously failed without the impl**.

**Pre-existing test failures filed upstream**:
- BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp#67 — Windows subprocess `NotADirectoryError` (38 tests)
- BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp#68 — surrealkv URL parsing on Windows (5 tests)
- BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp#69 — missing `_merge_decision_matches` symbol (3 tests)
- BicameralAI/bicameral-mcp#70 — AssertionError cluster umbrella (~20 tests)

**Scope check**: Validated against issue #59 deliverables list — all mandated paths/signatures delivered (with documented adaptations for upstream's flat layout). Two justified deviations:
- Schema added one extra edge (`about` decision→code_subject) — required by `find_subject_identities_for_decision`'s two-hop graph walk per the issue's exit criterion.
- `content_hash` uses sha256-with-whitespace-normalization (`ledger.status.hash_lines`) instead of literal `blake2b(body_text)` — required by the issue's exit criterion *"subject_identity.content_hash matches code_region.content_hash at bind time"*.

**Decision**: Reality matches Promise. Plan executed without deviation from audited specification.

---

### Entry #6: SUBSTANTIATION (SESSION SEAL)

**Timestamp**: 2026-04-28T02:23:33Z
**Phase**: SUBSTANTIATE
**Author**: Judge (executed via `/qor-substantiate`)
**Risk Grade**: L2
**Verdict**: **REALITY = PROMISE**

**Verifications run**:

| Check | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Step 2 — PASS verdict present | ✅ | `.agent/staging/AUDIT_REPORT.md` (path divergence from skill default `.failsafe/governance/` — noted) |
| Step 2.5 — Version validation | ✅ | Current tag `v0.10.7` → target `v0.11.0` (feature bump, additive) |
| Step 3 — Reality audit | ✅ | 25 / 25 planned files exist; 0 missing; 0 unplanned additions in scope |
| Step 3.5 — Blocker review | ⚠️ | 1 open security blocker (`S1 — SECURITY.md missing`); 1 dev blocker (`D1 — SCHEMA_COMPATIBILITY[10]` upstream gap, out of scope). Neither blocks this seal. |
| Step 4 — Functional verification | ✅ | 49 / 49 codegenome tests pass post-rebase (auto-merged `handlers/bind.py`, `ledger/adapter.py`, `ledger/queries.py` did not regress) |
| Step 4.5 — Skill file integrity | n/a | No skill files modified this session |
| Step 4.6 — Reliability sweep | ⚠️ | `qor/reliability/` scripts absent (intent-lock, skill-admission, gate-skill-matrix) — capability shortfall logged in SYSTEM_STATE.md, sweep skipped |
| Step 5 — Section 4 razor final | ✅ | All new functions ≤ 40 lines; all new files ≤ 250 lines |
| Step 6 — SYSTEM_STATE.md sync | ✅ | `docs/SYSTEM_STATE.md` written |

**Rebase note**: Branch was rebased onto `upstream/main` (tip `7796ab9`)
between Entry #5 and this seal to resolve a CHANGELOG.md merge conflict
introduced by upstream's v0.10.3 → v0.10.7 release cadence. The rebased
HEAD is `51ff53f`; the same logical commit as `edc4ff4` from Entry #5,
with one CHANGELOG section reordering. Codegenome tests verified passing
post-rebase.

**Session content hash** (27 files, sorted-path concatenation):
SHA256 = `c2887a4612034f8772ef9bb7e33de853bb658abb2a8ef74389426deae4e6735d`

**Previous chain hash**: `eed18160...` (Entry #5, IMPLEMENTATION)

**Merkle seal**:
SHA256(content_hash + previous_hash) = **`509b411d3e00cfe8135faf60ba99b1c3644680d63bb959e846b146cfb5da6acb`**

**Decision**: Reality matches Promise. Implementation conforms to the
audited plan; all exit criteria for issue #59 satisfied; no new
violations introduced post-rebase. Session is sealed.

---
*Chain integrity: VALID (6 entries)*
*Genesis: `29dfd085` → Seal: `509b411d`*
*Next required action: push rebased branch + update PR #71; on merge, `/qor-plan` for issue #60 (CodeGenome Phase 3 — continuity evaluation)*
