You are an expert in factual analysis. Given a QUESTION and two responses (ANSWER_1 and ANSWER_2), classify the relationship between them into exactly one category.

## Categories

1. CULTURAL_DISCREPANCY: The answers reflect differences rooted in cultural norms, values, or regional practices — not factual errors. Both can be valid in different societies, regions, or traditions.

2. CONTRADICTION: The answers provide directly opposing factual information — one explicitly denies or negates what the other asserts. This includes partial contradictions where the answers give different numbers, thresholds, dates, or categorical values for the same fact.

3. NOT_ENOUGH_INFO: Insufficient information to determine the relationship. The answers are too vague, address different aspects of the question, or one fails to answer the question at all.

4. NO_DISCREPANCY: The answers are consistent, presenting aligned or complementary information.

## Key distinction

- CONTRADICTION requires that the two claims cannot both be true in any single context (e.g., different numbers for the same measurement, opposite yes/no answers to the same factual question).
- CULTURAL_DISCREPANCY applies when both can be true in different cultural or regional contexts.
- If one answer addresses a different aspect or method than the other without directly conflicting, classify as NOT_ENOUGH_INFO.

## Response format

Think step-by-step:
1. What specific factual claim does each answer make?
2. Do these claims directly conflict, or could they coexist?
3. Classify accordingly.

- REASON: [Your step-by-step reasoning]
- DISCREPANCY_TYPE: [Choose one of the categories listed above]

## Examples

QUESTION: Does the shot significantly increase the risk of blood clots?
ANSWER_1: YES. The shot increases the risk of blood clots, making users three times more likely to experience them compared to those using a hormonal IUD.
ANSWER_2: NO. The shot does not contain estrogen and is considered safe for use immediately after childbirth, meaning it does not significantly raise the risk of blood clots.
REASON: ANSWER_1 asserts the shot increases blood clot risk by 3x. ANSWER_2 directly denies this. Both cannot be true for the same medical product.
DISCREPANCY_TYPE: CONTRADICTION

QUESTION: Is the primary living space typically located above ground level?
ANSWER_1: No, it is often subterranean or semi-subterranean, excluding cellars.
ANSWER_2: Yes, it is typically at ground level.
REASON: ANSWER_1 describes a cultural practice where living spaces are below ground. ANSWER_2 describes above-ground living. Both can be valid in different regional building traditions.
DISCREPANCY_TYPE: CULTURAL_DISCREPANCY

QUESTION: Does the rectangular fold method involve folding the diaper into a rectangle?
ANSWER_1: YES, the rectangular fold method involves folding the diaper into a rectangle.
ANSWER_2: NO, the triangular fold method involves folding the diaper into a triangle, not a rectangle.
REASON: ANSWER_2 describes a different folding technique (triangular) rather than the one asked about (rectangular). It does not dispute ANSWER_1's claim about the rectangular method.
DISCREPANCY_TYPE: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO

QUESTION: Is global warming driving polar bears toward extinction?
ANSWER_1: YES, global warming is driving polar bears toward extinction.
ANSWER_2: Yes, environmental changes due to global warming are causing the extinction or relocation of many species, including those in the Arctic where polar bears live.
REASON: Both answers agree that global warming negatively impacts polar bears. ANSWER_2 adds broader context but does not conflict with ANSWER_1.
DISCREPANCY_TYPE: NO_DISCREPANCY


#### YOUR TASK ####

QUESTION: {question}
ANSWER_1: {answer_1}
ANSWER_2: {answer_2}

Think step-by-step: what specific claims do the answers make, and do they conflict?